What is Homeopathy? Why don't more people in the USA know about it?
Homeopathy is a
system of medicine that is over two hundred years old. In 1810 Samuel Hahnemann, a German medical
doctor, published his book “Organon of the Rational Art of Healing.” This laid the foundations for the practice of
homeopathy, a practice based on Hahnemann’s own scientific experimentation,
testing his highly diluted, and therefore safe, substances on himself and other
human volunteers. Hahnemann's book was revised
and rewritten in six editions before his death in 1843. The sixth edition of Hahnemann’s book was not
actually published until 1921 under the title “Organon of Medicine.” Hahnemann’s research led him to develop a
philosophical and practical framework for the practice of medicine that rested
on the following three principles:
1) Like
cures like
2) The
minimum dose
3) Individualization
of treatment
Most
controversial of these is the second principle of homeopathy, the minimum
dose. Very small doses of medicinal
substances are uses. These are
successively diluted and shaken vigorously during preparation. As stated already, the original title of
Hahnemann’s book was “Organon of the Rational
Healing Art,” and yet today homeopathy is often dismissed for being
irrational. It seems irrational to
believe that infinitesimal doses of medicinal substances could have any effect,
let alone a curative effect on an illness.
However, the practice of Hahnemann himself, as well as those of hundreds
of thousands of homeopaths around the world, bear witness to its efficacy.
The rational
explanation for the efficacy of homeopathy may come from quantum physics. Apparently quantum physics does not disprove
Newtonian physics, it “simply extends our understanding of extremely small and
extremely large systems. Likewise
homeopathy does not disprove conventional pharmacology; instead, it extends our
understanding of extremely small doses of medicinal agents” (Dana Ullman, MPH).
If homeopathy
does work, why isn’t it more prevalent in the USA today? Dana Ullman states in his article “Lincoln
and his Team of Homeopaths” (Huffington Post 12/23/2012) that after great
success during the cholera and typhoid epidemics of the mid-1800’s homeopathy
began to be viewed with suspicion, and perhaps envy, by the AMA. According
to Ullman one AMA member got kicked out of his local medical society for
consulting with a homeopath, who also happened to be his wife. Ullman states that in the 1850s and 1860s
“the conventional medical community was threatened by the fact that homeopathy
was attracting so many US cultural leaders.
The strongest advocates for homeopathy tended to be educated classes and
wealthy Americans as well as abolitionists, the literary greats (including virtually
all of the leading American transcendentalist authors), and the suffragists
(homeopathy admitted women into their medical schools and associations several
decades before the conventional doctors did).”
In 2011 the Swiss
government commissioned the most comprehensive report ever conducted on
homeopathy that concluded it to be both clinical and cost-effective. Today it is in widespread use in many
countries including the UK, where the Royal Family are supporters, and India,
where it is regarded by many as being “for the poor,” because it is not as
expensive as western medicine.
Maybe we can
learn a thing or two about cost-effectiveness in medicine and simultaneously
reduce the terrible side-effects suffered as a result of using many
conventional (allopathic) medicines.
Comments
Post a Comment